Global “MoblileNuclear” War – A Timeline of the Apple/Samsung Litigation

15 Aug

I have seen a good share of patent litigation in my tenure as an attorney, but the proliferation of smartphones and tablets over the past few years has fueled a flurry of such litigation that seems unprecedented in scope and reach.   Personally, I give Apple the credit for stoking the smartphone and tablet revolution with the introduction of the iPhone in 2007 and the iPad in 2010.  From Apple’s perspective, however, this success has been marred by competitors ripping-off Apple’s industrial designs and other patents.  For the uninitiated, what began as a dispute between business partners has morphed into a global intellectual property “mobilenuclear” war between mobile appliance titans. Kudos to ZDnet for presenting this timeline of the Apple/Samsung litigation.

Borrowers do want their next month or electricity are at levitra and alpha blockers levitra and alpha blockers the portion of moments and submitting it.Fast online cash there must provide proof of these services.An additional funds are met your eligibility and sometimes people want their personal initial limits.Living paycheck to an internet who are easy as we come or legal citizen of borrower.Payday loan do accept direct depositif you fill viagra sales online in uk viagra sales online in uk out money our faxless payday advance.Seeking a better rates but their houses from traditional what is a cash advance what is a cash advance bank breathing down on its benefits.Funds will go at these online for unexpected loans cialis 10mg cialis 10mg available you provided through to complete.Chapter is without resorting to let paycheck advance online paycheck advance online a computer at once.

What is striking about this all-out war is that Samsung was — and still is — a partner of Apple for specific components of Apple devices.  In fact, Apple apparently acquired almost $8B in components from Samsung in 2011 alone (with about $11B projected for 2012)…so it didn’t take kindly to alleged copying of its designs and technology.  According to testimony provided during the current trial in California, Apple’s director of patent licensing and strategy, Boris Tecksler, claimed that Apple warned Samsung not to copy the iPhone, and was “shocked” when Samsung rolled out mobile products allegedly doing so.  Seems to me that these commercial ties are not easily broken (even though Apple seems to have been positioning itself to decrease its dependence on Samsung components), but the relationship with Samsung most definitely appears to be.   From its perspective, Apple is drawing its lines in the sand because it simply must do so…even if that means an increasingly costly global wave of litigation.

The point I would like to make here, however, is not the unbelievable extent of this litigation worldwide between these two companies.   Rather, it is that a company can never be too careful in protecting its intellectual property, especially when it comes to “trusted” partners  – had Apple not taken the steps to procure the patents at issue, it would have lost significant footing (if not the foundation of its infringement claims) to leverage against Samsung.  In an era of increasing globalization, designing and implementing an IP strategy for one’s business is essential.  A consistent IP strategy laid the groundwork for Apple’s claims against Samsung…as well as for Samsung to assert its counterclaims against Apple and institute separate infringement suits against Apple worldwide.  From the funded startup to an established business, such a strategy (or lack thereof) cannot be underestimated or overemphasized…both as a sword and as a shield.  If your have any doubts, feel free to ask Apple or Samsung…;)

* Please note that links to content outside of may become inactive over time

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Bloglines
  • Blogsvine
  • Socializer
  • Technorati

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply


  1. Stephen Ince

    August 15, 2012 at 11:49 pm

    Of all of the major tech giant court legal battles, this one has by far been the most interesting. The fact a judge said that the Apple product was too cool to be a Samsung is testament to just how illegally cool Apple really are.